<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Conversations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/</link>
	<description>Our People and Perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Idetrorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnjbtw.com/?p=50#comment-494</guid>
		<description>very interesting, but I don&#039;t agree with you 
Idetrorce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JNJ BTW &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>JNJ BTW &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnjbtw.com/?p=50#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] about legal actions &#8212; or introduce legal experts who can do so &#8212; as I’ve said before, Johnson &amp; Johnson typically prefers not to litigate its cases outside of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about legal actions &#8212; or introduce legal experts who can do so &#8212; as I’ve said before, Johnson &#38; Johnson typically prefers not to litigate its cases outside of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JNJ BTW &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You&#8217;re Doing What?!</title>
		<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>JNJ BTW &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You&#8217;re Doing What?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnjbtw.com/?p=50#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned in an earlier post , Johnson &amp; Johnson seldom comments on lawsuits in progress, preferring to leave to the courts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned in an earlier post , Johnson &#38; Johnson seldom comments on lawsuits in progress, preferring to leave to the courts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W</title>
		<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnjbtw.com/?p=50#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Makes sense to me Marc. Defining the rules as corporates open up is important groundbreaking work - too difficult for government. Keep it up. William at Ideal Gov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense to me Marc. Defining the rules as corporates open up is important groundbreaking work &#8211; too difficult for government. Keep it up. William at Ideal Gov</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnjbtw.com/?p=50#comment-38</guid>
		<description>As a journalist covering pharma for more years than I care to admit, this conservative, cautious policy is all too familiar to me -- but just as maddening as when I first encountered it.

It makes defendant companies seem uniformly guilty when they very well might not be, and contributes to public suspicion, which I&#039;m sure you will agree isn&#039;t helpful.

As you say, discovery can take years, and frequently out-of-court settlements with nondisclosure terms are the result, adding to the industry&#039;s stigma in society.

If you were as clever at prudent disclosures as you are at reserving your defenses, you could get some of your story out while the news is hot without arming your adversaries with free ammunition. It just takes will to do so, to find a way. Unfortunately, eons of conservative nondisclosure has created an easier course, and most companies simply follow it, without innovating ways of satisfying their markets&#039; need for reassurance and continuing confidence after a suit is filed,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a journalist covering pharma for more years than I care to admit, this conservative, cautious policy is all too familiar to me &#8212; but just as maddening as when I first encountered it.</p>
<p>It makes defendant companies seem uniformly guilty when they very well might not be, and contributes to public suspicion, which I&#8217;m sure you will agree isn&#8217;t helpful.</p>
<p>As you say, discovery can take years, and frequently out-of-court settlements with nondisclosure terms are the result, adding to the industry&#8217;s stigma in society.</p>
<p>If you were as clever at prudent disclosures as you are at reserving your defenses, you could get some of your story out while the news is hot without arming your adversaries with free ammunition. It just takes will to do so, to find a way. Unfortunately, eons of conservative nondisclosure has created an easier course, and most companies simply follow it, without innovating ways of satisfying their markets&#8217; need for reassurance and continuing confidence after a suit is filed,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: general johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>general johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnjbtw.com/?p=50#comment-33</guid>
		<description>wimpy answer, get some fortitude, defend what i built,i&#039;m rolling over in my grave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wimpy answer, get some fortitude, defend what i built,i&#8217;m rolling over in my grave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n</title>
		<link>http://www.jnjbtw.com/2007/07/legal-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnjbtw.com/?p=50#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

